Wednesday, January 12, 2005

Bravo is twice as queer but half as good.

has anyone witnessed the sad tragedy that is Queer Eye for the Straight Girl? not that the concept is too contrived (cough, couigh.) but what is with the rag tag team of queers they have helping these poor women out? none of them are even remotely interesting. REMOTELY. i mean, even Ted the food guy from original Queer Eye is slightly amusing to the point of endearing.

the cast of this mutation is vapid. and unnattractive. and there's a lesbian. there is only one charming fellow and its only because he has a smooth british accent that reminds me of my friend H.V. and he's by the way, the only one attractive enough to make watching the show bearable.

while im not the hugest fan of the Queer Eye show anyhow - i think that when the guys really start hamming it up for the camera, it can get a little degrading and smacks of modern day blackface - but when i saw this new show last night, all i could think was "accursed bravo, wretch, what hast though done?"